justscribing: (❖ 42)
Alhaitham ([personal profile] justscribing) wrote in [community profile] citylogs 2024-01-01 09:40 pm (UTC)

If the information was truly useless that means that they have a degree of control over the situation that makes our boundary testing, even unpredictably, a minor issue. Why would they worry about how many times we try to walk through the fog? It's only a problem if they have reasonable concern we can break the simulation.

Also, every other piece of information has simply been provided to us directly rather than being left in strange places. It was also accessible to everyone. We've proven model behavior that we'll investigate whatever is lying around, so why change the dissemination from one that already works if it's just a distraction?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org