Charming answers, but I'll have to give you half points.
[ It isn't his field. But you don't get to be as high as he is, and far more in touch with leading a variety of people as he has, without a little know-how. And gentle guidance. ]
Psychological security is what we demonstrated now -- that is, being unafraid to put out ideas, criticism, so on and so forth. Communication. A degradation of it'd mean they began to punish or ridicule their subjects for... non-conformity of opinion, perhaps. They wouldn't be doing what we're doing now, and probably accepted their fates and attended the experiments as prompted.
And, in a sustainable city as it mentions, it refers to our needs being met without our worrying if we're gonna be eating the next day. Vices too, such as drinking and smoking. Taking them away over a long period of time is the degradation of that, though I'm not particularly worried since we'd just need to become nomadic to survive.
[ So, communication and survivability in essence. ]
As for the second, it's just a fancy way to say what you did: taking it apart, a community's resilience in dealing with particular disasters and such by how they might work together to ensure its success, and network for, well, networking. If we kept to ourselves and ultimately did nothing to bond, then that would be counted as a failure on their part if they were hoping that circumstances would drive us to open up.
We can't know for certain the aims of these experiments, but the culmination of them can be seen in how we're being dealt with now. "Integrating Community Perspectives" in the first might refer to those surveys that've popped up every now and then on our devices. You've been worried about our being from different worlds messing with their data, but aren't we perfectly suited for experiments dealing with providing a variety of solutions for problems they throw our way and seeing if we'll become friendly despite our many differences?
no subject
[ It isn't his field. But you don't get to be as high as he is, and far more in touch with leading a variety of people as he has, without a little know-how. And gentle guidance. ]
Psychological security is what we demonstrated now -- that is, being unafraid to put out ideas, criticism, so on and so forth. Communication. A degradation of it'd mean they began to punish or ridicule their subjects for... non-conformity of opinion, perhaps. They wouldn't be doing what we're doing now, and probably accepted their fates and attended the experiments as prompted.
And, in a sustainable city as it mentions, it refers to our needs being met without our worrying if we're gonna be eating the next day. Vices too, such as drinking and smoking. Taking them away over a long period of time is the degradation of that, though I'm not particularly worried since we'd just need to become nomadic to survive.
[ So, communication and survivability in essence. ]
As for the second, it's just a fancy way to say what you did: taking it apart, a community's resilience in dealing with particular disasters and such by how they might work together to ensure its success, and network for, well, networking. If we kept to ourselves and ultimately did nothing to bond, then that would be counted as a failure on their part if they were hoping that circumstances would drive us to open up.
We can't know for certain the aims of these experiments, but the culmination of them can be seen in how we're being dealt with now. "Integrating Community Perspectives" in the first might refer to those surveys that've popped up every now and then on our devices. You've been worried about our being from different worlds messing with their data, but aren't we perfectly suited for experiments dealing with providing a variety of solutions for problems they throw our way and seeing if we'll become friendly despite our many differences?